lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] user namespaces: document CFS behavior

    * Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:

    > Quoting James Morris (jmorris@namei.org):
    > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > >
    > > > > They're already published in my tree. Do you want me to revert them?
    > > >
    > > > I've also got it published :-/ If it's at the tail of your commits, can
    > > > you reset it?
    > >
    > > There have been commits since, and people are using the tree in any case.
    >
    > Yikes. Maybe it's best (henceforth) to keep user namespaces patches in
    > their own tree toward the end of linux-next? There certainly are
    > security implications with all of them, but other things (filesystem,
    > sched) will be impacted as well...

    i'm fine with having this in James's tree - i didnt realize that you had
    another commit that created dependencies.

    (if such situations ever cause real damage then we can always create a
    separate branch to track it cleanly. That's not needed now.)

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-12-12 12:09    [W:0.025 / U:0.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site