[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc][patch] SLQB slab allocator
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 08:23:55AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Anyway, I'll see if I can work out why SLQB is slower. Do you have
> socketallocbench online?

Hmph, it seems to be in the noise (I'm testing with an AMD system
though). Some boots SLAB is faster, other boots, SLQB is. Could be
a matter of luck in cacheline placement maybe?

I think this benchmark (after the slab rcu patch) will be pretty
trivial for any slab allocator because it will basically be each
CPU allocating then freeing an object.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-12 10:45    [W:0.055 / U:5.640 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site