Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Frans Pop <> | Subject | Re: Regression from 2.6.26: Hibernation (possibly suspend) broken on Toshiba R500 (bisected) | Date | Tue, 2 Dec 2008 05:31:50 +0100 |
| |
> Oh, btw, one more thing: since it apparently sometimes _does_ resume > from hibernation without all this, I'd also like to see the actual > differences in /proc/ioports and /proc/iomem that happen as a result of > the different alignment.
You're in luck. I still had /proc/io* contents from .28-rc3 lying around from working on some other issue.
Here's the relevant diff for iomem; there's no diff for ioports.
--- iomem_2.6.28-rc3 2008-11-03 10:59:37.000000000 +0100 +++ iomem_2.6.28-rc6_linus 2008-12-02 05:20:31.000000000 +0100 @@ -10,10 +10,9 @@ 7e7b0000-7e7c53ff : reserved 7e7c5400-7e7e7fb7 : ACPI Non-volatile Storage 7e7e7fb8-7effffff : reserved -80000000-83ffffff : PCI Bus 0000:02 - 80000000-83ffffff : PCI CardBus 0000:03 -84000000-87ffffff : PCI CardBus 0000:03 -88000000-88000fff : Intel Flush Page +80000000-83ffffff : PCI CardBus 0000:03 +84000000-84000fff : Intel Flush Page +84400000-847fffff : PCI CardBus 0000:03 d0000000-dfffffff : 0000:00:02.0 d0000000-d076ffff : vesafb e0000000-e00fffff : PCI Bus 0000:10 I've tried a few quick suspend/resume cycles and no failures so far, but that's not really conclusive yet.
Besides snd_hda_intel I've also been unloading e1000e before suspend because I thought it contributed to resume failures. I'm now keeping that loaded as well. Will report results.
Cheers, FJP
| |