Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:13:54 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: [please, revert] Re: [PATCH 11/32] of_platform_driver noise on sparce | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:23:29 +0000
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 01:05:41AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > There's tons of sparc specific drivers not handled here. > > For example, drivers/scsi/sun_esp.c, drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.c, > > and on and on and on. > > > > In fact there are more sparc specific drivers using > > of_platform_driver under drivers/ thans powerpc :) > > > > I don't think I want to do this for now, sorry Al. > > Argh... Looks like that got picked despite the NAK ;-/
It looks like all of your patches got applied regardless of what followups they received.
I'll chalk this up to a simple oversight given that Linus just got back from a week of vacation :)
> Linus, could you revert commit e669dae6141ff97d3c7566207f5de3b487dcf837? > NAKed by maintainer, so...
I'd really like the other sparc changes to get kicked out as well, which as I just indicated in another reply I put into my sparc-next-2.6 tree instead. The risk is just not worth it as I've broken sparc already with similar "obvious" section fixups.
This is really a big hassle for another reason, because Sam is in the process of unifying sparc32 and sparc64 in the sparc-next-2.6 tree.
Now that these changes went into upstream it's possible that I'm going to have a lot of fun sorting out the merge conflicts. Although some initial test merges indicate that we might be able get away with this one with only minor pain.
| |