lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpumask: introduce new API, without changing anything

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> > On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, I sent through the latest delta on top of this before, but see below.
> >
> > Can somebody send a final patch-set to me? Right now I have multiple
> > versions of patches, apparently on top of each other, and sometimes
> > multiple patches per email. Very confusing, and I do _not_ want to
> > apply the wrong thing by mistake.
>
> I've got them collected and tested (and so has Rusty), see the tree
> URI below. There's no pending problem left that i know of. I also
> just did a fresh test-build and test-boot of this tree, for good
> measure.

Thomas did a cross-build test of Linus's latest
(v2.6.28-rc3-261-g8b805ef), and it seems OK (see the results below) -
no new cross-build failures introduced.

Ingo

--------------->
Run 142: 2008-11-09 21:38:04 .. 2008-11-09 22:30:35

Run 142: 17 of 19 operations OK
Run 142: 2 of 19 operations FAILED

http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/000142-0008-0005.log
http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/000142-0008-0015.log

Changed warnings:
http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/d000141-000142-0008-0006.log
http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/d000141-000142-0008-0023.log
http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-logs/d000141-000142-0008-0024.log

Full results at: http://www.tglx.de/autoqa/index
_______________________________________________
autoqa mailing list
autoqa@www.tglx.de
http://www.tglx.de/mailman/listinfo/autoqa


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-09 22:41    [W:0.061 / U:2.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site