Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: make NR_IRQS on 32bit is same to 64bit | From | Matt Mackall <> | Date | Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:36:09 -0600 |
| |
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 23:23 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 22:52 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Clean-up sidenote: i think we can now remove the VISWS #ifdef portion > > > >> for good? Mind sending a patch for that too? > > > > > > > > could remove CONFIG_PARAVIRT too.. Jeremy? > > > > > > > > > > This seems like a bad idea, especially for the embedded guys. > > > > I'd actually really like to see us move to dynamically-allocated irq > > tables as they're currently huge. But I haven't dug into it deeply > > enough to see what sort of gotchas are involved. > > sparseirq (== dynamic IRQ tables) is all implemented already, and most > of the details except the final feature-enabler are upstream already.
Thanks for the pointer, I'd missed this going by.
-- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
| |