lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: next-20081103 - possible circular locking dependency detected while bring up eth1
Date
> > [   31.989072] 2 locks held by events/3/18:
> > [ 31.989072] #0: (events){--..}, at: [<c04367bf>] run_workqueue+0x80/0x189
> > [ 31.989072] #1: ((linkwatch_work).work){--..}, at: [<c04367bf>] run_workqueue+0x80/0x189
> > [ 31.989072]
> > [ 31.989072] stack backtrace:
> > [ 31.989072] Pid: 18, comm: events/3 Not tainted 2.6.28-rc3-next-20081103-autotest #1
> > [ 31.989072] Call Trace:
> > [ 31.989072] [<c0445662>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xa4/0xaf
> > [ 31.989072] [<c0445c10>] validate_chain+0x5a3/0xb35
> > [ 31.989072] [<c0446822>] __lock_acquire+0x680/0x70e
> > [ 31.989072] [<c04367bf>] ? run_workqueue+0x80/0x189
> > [ 31.989072] [<c044690d>] lock_acquire+0x5d/0x7a
> > [ 31.989072] [<c05e8ef5>] ? rtnl_lock+0xf/0x11
> > [ 31.989072] [<c0651c04>] mutex_lock_nested+0xdf/0x251
> > [ 31.989072] [<c05e8ef5>] ? rtnl_lock+0xf/0x11
> > [ 31.989072] [<c05e8ef5>] ? rtnl_lock+0xf/0x11
> > [ 31.989072] [<c05e8ef5>] rtnl_lock+0xf/0x11
> > [ 31.989072] [<c05ea07a>] linkwatch_event+0x8/0x27
> > [ 31.989072] [<c04367fd>] run_workqueue+0xbe/0x189
> > [ 31.989072] [<c04367bf>] ? run_workqueue+0x80/0x189
> > [ 31.989072] [<c05ea072>] ? linkwatch_event+0x0/0x27
> > [ 31.989072] [<c043713f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0xbf
> > [ 31.989072] [<c04371f3>] worker_thread+0xb4/0xbf
> > [ 31.989072] [<c0439765>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x33
> > [ 31.989072] [<c04396a6>] kthread+0x3b/0x61
> > [ 33.690691] tg3: eth1: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex.
> > [ 33.690696] tg3: eth1: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
> > [ 31.989072] [<c043966b>] ? kthread+0x0/0x61
> > [ 31.989072] [<c040481b>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> > [ 33.762336] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth1: link becomes ready
> > [ OK ]
>
> I think we have to go with Kosaki-san's vm workqueue...

Very sorry for my lazyness.
akpm did nak vm workqueue patch.

So I prepare new patch now. (it is under testing now)
I expect I can post it tommorow.

Thanks.






\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-05 10:17    [W:0.063 / U:5.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site