Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:12:04 +0100 | From | "Vegard Nossum" <> | Subject | Re: Git next: Second stage of cpu_alloc patches |
| |
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > We need to get alpha sorted out too. Frankly, if we can't get anyone to > review/test/ack the alpha genirq conversion then I'd say merge it > anyway. I'll make sure that it at least compiles.
Sounds like a bad strategy. What are these patches you're talking about, and where can I find them?
I mean, isn't "merge anyway" the same as admitting defeat? I thought we were going for 100% "review coverage".
Vegard
-- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
| |