Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:55:48 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes |
| |
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> * Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > > > My estimation is that if we do it right, your approach will behave > > > better on modern CPUs (which is what matters most for such > > > things), especially on real workloads where there's a considerable > > > instruction-cache pressure. But it should be measured in any case. > > > > Fully agreed. I will do some measurements in the near future, maybe > > next week. At least noone came up with an absolutely blocking > > problem with this approach ;). > > how about "it does not build with lguest enabled" as a blocking > problem? ;-) > > arch/x86/lguest/built-in.o: In function `lguest_init_IRQ': > boot.c:(.init.text+0x33f): undefined reference to `interrupt' > > config attached.
... other than that it booted fine on a few testboxes here. That's still not an exhaustive test by any means, but it's promising.
Ingo
| |