[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 05/24] perfmon: X86 generic code (x86)
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, David Miller wrote:

> From: "stephane eranian" <>
> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:35:54 +0100
> > I am still wondering how Oprofile handles the case where multiple
> > processes or threads access the same file descriptor.
> There's only one profiling buffer active on a given cpu,
> so it's pure per-cpu value insertion.
> In any event I think that NMI profiling is a must, especially
> for the kernel. You get total unusable crap otherwise. I
> just learned this the hard way having gotten an NMI'ish scheme
> working on sparc64 just the other day.

Not arguing about that, I'm just not agreeing with the implementation.

So for the moment we can go w/o the NMI and implement it cleanly after
we got the initial lot in.



 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-27 12:53    [W:0.085 / U:8.744 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site