[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: rr tree build failure
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:41:32 -0800, Greg KH <> wrote:

> > > > This reverts to the 2005 (pre- aafbf24a) behaviour where "nousb" was
> > > > not a module parameter, just a kernel command line parameter. That's
> > > > more sensible anyway.

By the way, I floated the idea to remove "nousb" altogether on fedora-devel.
Alan Cox replied that he has an actual box that requires it,
because of a bug in SMM BIOS... Imagine my surprise. I think we're
stuck with "nousb" for a little while still.

-- Pete

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-24 05:27    [W:0.049 / U:3.288 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site