Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:28:08 +0530 | From | Bharata B Rao <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: Don't allow priority switch to realtime when the task doesn't belong to init_task_group and when CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED isn't set |
| |
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:11:16AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 11:48 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > > Applies on 2.6.28-rc5. > > > > With CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED not set, don't allow a task's priority switch > > to realtime if the task isn't part of init_task_group. > > > > A task belonging to a fair group could use sched_setscheduler/sched_setparam > > to become a realtime task. If such a task belongs to one of the > > child groups of init_task_group and if CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set, > > then it ends up getting queued in init_task_group's runqueue. > > So we have a situation where, a task belongs to one group (child) > > but ends in the runqueue of another group (init_task_group). > > This does not look correct. > > > > Fix this by failing such priority change requests in sched_setscheduler() > > and sched_setparam(). > > NAK > > !RT_GROUP means the RT tasks should be fully invariant to any grouping > configuration. This patch breaks that. > > Furthermore your justification for this is plain wrong, you write as if > an RT tasks can belong to any grouping (in the !RT_GROUP case), by the
Hmm... but that's I the impression I got when I started an RT task in a subgroup and saw it listed in the tasks list of the cgroup. So if RT tasks don't care about grouping (!RT_GROUP_SCHED), may be then such tasks shoudn't be shown in the cgroup tasks list. And may be as Ingo suggested they should be moved to init_task_group. Without that it makes one think that a task is contributing to the cpu time of a group in which it was started, but it in reality it is not.
Regards, Bharata.
| |