lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for November 19 (mtd build error)
From
Date
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:24 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:18 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > So does the dependency need to be something like
> > "depends on SFC && MTD && !(SFC=y && MTD=m)"?
>
> If it's a separate driver, perhaps it's sufficient just to make it a
> tristate and make it depend on SFC && MTD?

It's not a separate driver.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-19 20:45    [W:0.065 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site