Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for November 19 (mtd build error) | From | Ben Hutchings <> | Date | Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:43:25 +0000 |
| |
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:24 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:18 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > So does the dependency need to be something like > > "depends on SFC && MTD && !(SFC=y && MTD=m)"? > > If it's a separate driver, perhaps it's sufficient just to make it a > tristate and make it depend on SFC && MTD?
It's not a separate driver.
Ben.
-- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
| |