lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03 of 38] swiotlb: allow architectures tooverride swiotlb pool allocation
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> While perhaps less intrusive to take care of, I also didn't see an equivalent
>> of the range_straddles_page_boundary() logic, without which I can't see
>> how this would work in the common case.
>>
> Could you be more specific? The swiotlb allocation should be machine
> contiguous and so there's no stradding required, but I think I'm missing
> your point.

In general, I think you are right; swiotlb should be machine contiguous, so it
works in the normal case. The range_straddles_page_boundary function takes care
of a corner case, where you can run into swiotlb exhaustion when you really
shouldn't. As I understand it, it comes about because it is possible to get a
swiotlb request with two pages that just happen to be machine contiguous, but
were *not* allocated through xen_create_contiguous_region (and hence weren't
marked in the contiguous_bitmap as such). In this case, you split the request
into two separate requests, and this can more easily lead to exhaustion.
range_straddles_page_boundary works around this by checking whether any two
pages coming through the swiotlb layer are machine contiguous, and if they are,
not splitting the request.

--
Chris Lalancette


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-17 09:07    [W:0.151 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site