Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:33:19 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 |
| |
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > hm, i'm not sure whether i can post benchmarks from the Nehalem box - > but i can confirm it in general terms that it's rather nice ;-)
Intel released the NDA from various web sites a week or two ago, and Intel is now selling it in the US (I think today was in fact the official launch), so I think benchmarks are safe - you can buy the dang things on the street.
I don't know what availability is, of course. But I doubt that Intel would mind Nehalem benchmarks even if it were a paper launch - at least from my personal experience, I've not seen any bad behavior (and plenty of good).
> This was run on another testbox (4x4 Barcelona) that rocks similarly > well in terms of memory subsystem latencies: which seems to be > tbench's main current critical path.
Ahh, ok.
Linus
| |