[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: question: ata_sff_hsm_move: ata15 (why always ata15)?

On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:22:58 -0600
>> Robert Hancock <> wrote:
>>> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>>> I am trying to find out what the root cause of this error/problem is:
>>> The problem is that people assume that timeouts with DRDY like that bug
>>> refers to must be the same problem when it is often not
>> The first stopping point is to apply the DRQ drain patch I sent to the
>> list some time ago and is hopefully lined up for 2.6.29. After that point
>> you can begin to look at the remaining cases, until then its hardly worth
>> it.
> Is it really? For many SATA controllers, DRQ draining isn't really
> necessary. PATA might be a completely different story tho.

I have been running with the patch for almost 24 hours and running
extensive disk tests, so far nothing but sometimes it takes a few days
or more to repeat, I am continuing to test to see if the problem recurs..


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-16 10:15    [W:0.053 / U:8.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site