[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: bail out of page reclaim after swap_cluster_max pages
> > Of course, one thing we could do is exempt kswapd from this check.
> > During light reclaim, kswapd does most of the eviction so scanning
> > should remain balanced. Having one process fall down to a lower
> > priority level is also not a big problem.
> >
> > As long as the direct reclaim processes do not also fall into the
> > same trap, the situation should be manageable.
> >
> > Does that sound reasonable to you?
> I'll need to find some time to go dig through the changelogs.

as far as I tried, git database doesn't have that changelogs.
FWIW, I guess it is more old.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-16 09:15    [W:0.094 / U:4.800 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site