Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:43:10 +0900 (JST) | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: bail out of page reclaim after swap_cluster_max pages |
| |
> > Of course, one thing we could do is exempt kswapd from this check. > > During light reclaim, kswapd does most of the eviction so scanning > > should remain balanced. Having one process fall down to a lower > > priority level is also not a big problem. > > > > As long as the direct reclaim processes do not also fall into the > > same trap, the situation should be manageable. > > > > Does that sound reasonable to you? > > I'll need to find some time to go dig through the changelogs.
as far as I tried, git database doesn't have that changelogs. FWIW, I guess it is more old.
|  |