Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:54:10 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: bail out of page reclaim after swap_cluster_max pages |
| |
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:43:10 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > Of course, one thing we could do is exempt kswapd from this check. > > > During light reclaim, kswapd does most of the eviction so scanning > > > should remain balanced. Having one process fall down to a lower > > > priority level is also not a big problem. > > > > > > As long as the direct reclaim processes do not also fall into the > > > same trap, the situation should be manageable. > > > > > > Does that sound reasonable to you? > > > > I'll need to find some time to go dig through the changelogs. > > as far as I tried, git database doesn't have that changelogs. > FWIW, I guess it is more old. >
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/old-2.6-bkcvs.git goes back to 2.5.20 (iirc).
|  |