Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:03:03 -0800 | From | Mike Travis <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq v13 |
| |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Yinghai Lu wrote: >> so we have one list to map domain/bus/dev/func to bits [31,12] in irq ? >> > > That works, although having a more generic allocation mechanism which > isn't so tied to MSI-X would make more sense. > > -hpa
Hmm, I see I picked up this conversation quite late. I would agree that trying to map any set of fixed bit fields to domain/bus/device/function would be problematic (esp. since I don't understand how MSI's figure into the deal.)
Is there some reason why we need that?
Thanks, Mike
| |