[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq v13
    H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > Yinghai Lu wrote:
    >> so we have one list to map domain/bus/dev/func to bits [31,12] in irq ?
    > That works, although having a more generic allocation mechanism which
    > isn't so tied to MSI-X would make more sense.
    > -hpa

    Hmm, I see I picked up this conversation quite late. I would agree that
    trying to map any set of fixed bit fields to domain/bus/device/function
    would be problematic (esp. since I don't understand how MSI's figure into
    the deal.)

    Is there some reason why we need that?


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-11-17 03:05    [W:0.019 / U:6.732 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site