[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq v13
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> so we have one list to map domain/bus/dev/func to bits [31,12] in irq ?
> That works, although having a more generic allocation mechanism which
> isn't so tied to MSI-X would make more sense.
> -hpa

Hmm, I see I picked up this conversation quite late. I would agree that
trying to map any set of fixed bit fields to domain/bus/device/function
would be problematic (esp. since I don't understand how MSI's figure into
the deal.)

Is there some reason why we need that?


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-17 03:05    [W:0.061 / U:9.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site