lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq v13
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> It would, however, be a good idea if IOAPICs had their numbers assigned
> at detection time, as opposed to when the interrupt is registered, thus
> making it a stable number for a single boot, at least. The same is
> probably true for MSI(-X); we could assign it a range of numbers when
> the device is enumerated (as opposed to when a driver is activated), but
> I don't know to what extent that is likely to cause more troubles than
> it solves.

how to find the range for MSIX, one device/func may need a lot. for example, niu driver could use 20 MSI-X for one port. (one dev/func)
some could use 256. we only know that when driver is loaded.
So as Eric said, just try to use 12bits (4k range) for them.


YH


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-17 01:39    [W:0.081 / U:6.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site