Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:15:08 +0100 (CET) | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Subject | Re: [patch 02/17] get_cycles() : x86 HAVE_GET_CYCLES |
| |
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > --- linux.trees.git.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h 2008-11-12 18:15:25.000000000 -0500 > +++ linux.trees.git/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h 2008-11-12 18:15:28.000000000 -0500 > @@ -56,6 +56,18 @@ extern void mark_tsc_unstable(char *reas > extern int unsynchronized_tsc(void); > int check_tsc_unstable(void); > > +static inline cycles_t get_cycles_rate(void) > +{ > + if (check_tsc_unstable()) > + return 0; > + return tsc_khz; ^^^
The comment in Kconfig says:
| get_cycles_rate() : cycle counter rate, in HZ ^^
So what should it be? Hz or kHz?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |