lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: free all at rmdir
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:26:56 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> +5.1 on_rmdir
>> +set behavior of memcg at rmdir (Removing cgroup) default is "drop".
>> +
>> +5.1.1 drop
>> + #echo on_rmdir drop > memory.attribute
>> + This is default. All pages on the memcg will be freed.
>> + If pages are locked or too busy, they will be moved up to the parent.
>> + Useful when you want to drop (large) page caches used in this memcg.
>> + But some of in-use page cache can be dropped by this.
>> +
>> +5.1.2 keep
>> + #echo on_rmdir keep > memory.attribute
>> + All pages on the memcg will be moved to its parent.
>> + Useful when you don't want to drop page caches used in this memcg.
>> + You can keep page caches from some library or DB accessed by this
>> + memcg on memory.
>
> Would it not be more useful to implement a per-memcg version of
> /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches? (One without drop_caches' locking bug,
> hopefully).
>
> If we do this then we can make the above "keep" behaviour non-optional,
> and the operator gets to choose whether or not to drop the caches
> before doing the rmdir.
>
> Plus, we get a new per-memcg drop_caches capability. And it's a nicer
> interface, and it doesn't have the obvious races which on_rmdir has,
> etc.
>

Andrew, I suspect that will not be easy, since we don't track address spaces
that belong to a particular memcg. If page cache ends up being shared across
memcg's, dropping them would impact both mem cgroups.


--
Balbir


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-13 01:27    [W:0.107 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site