lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] Add replace_page(), change the mapping of pte from one page into another
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:24:21 +0100
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 03:31:18PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > ksm need the pte inside the vma to point from anonymous page into filebacked
> > > page
> > > can migrate.c do it without changes?
> >
> > So change anonymous to filebacked page?
> >
> > Currently page migration assumes that the page will continue to be part
> > of the existing file or anon vma.
> >
> > What you want sounds like assigning a swap pte to an anonymous page? That
> > way a anon page gains membership in a file backed mapping.
>
> KSM needs to convert anonymous pages to PageKSM, which means a page
> owned by ksm.c and only known by ksm.c. The Linux VM will free this
> page in munmap but that's about it, all we do is to match the number
> of anon-ptes pointing to the page with the page_count. So besides
> freeing the page when the last user exit()s or cows it, the VM will do
> nothing about it. Initially. Later it can swap it in a nonlinear way.
>
Can I make a question ? (I'm working for memory cgroup.)

Now, we do charge to anonymous page when
- charge(+1) when it's mapped firstly (mapcount 0->1)
- uncharge(-1) it's fully unmapped (mapcount 1->0) vir page_remove_rmap().

My quesion is
- PageKSM pages are not necessary to be tracked by memory cgroup ?
- Can we know that "the page is just replaced and we don't necessary to do
charge/uncharge".
- annonymous page from KSM is worth to be tracked by memory cgroup ?
(IOW, it's on LRU and can be swapped-out ?)

Thanks,
-Kame




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-12 03:23    [W:0.134 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site