[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectsplit-lru performance mesurement part2

> yup,
> I know many people want to other benchmark result too.
> I'll try to mesure other bench at next week.

I ran another benchmark today.
I choice dbench because dbench is one of most famous and real workload like i/o benchmark.

% dbench client.txt 4000

mainline: Throughput 13.4231 MB/sec 4000 clients 4000 procs max_latency=1421988.159 ms
mmotm(*): Throughput 7.0354 MB/sec 4000 clients 4000 procs max_latency=2369213.380 ms

(*) mmotm 2/Oct + Hugh's recently slub fix

mmotm is slower than mainline largely (about half performance).

Therefore, I mesured it on "mainline + split-lru(only)" build.

mainline + split-lru(only): Throughput 14.4062 MB/sec 4000 clients 4000 procs max_latency=1152231.896 ms

split-lru outperform mainline from viewpoint of both throughput and latency :)

However, I don't understand why this regression happend.
Do you have any suggestion?

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-07 16:29    [W:0.109 / U:2.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site