[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps

    * Alexander van Heukelum <> wrote:

    > Hi Ingo,
    > Here is the first round of unification of dumpstack_32.c
    > and dumpstack_64.c. The first patch can also be seen as
    > a clean-up of the traps.c-unification as I forgot to move
    > one function at the time. Anyhow, the series depends on
    > the traps unification.

    great - i've created tip/x86/dumpstack for this and applied your patches
    there. (that branch embedds tip/x86/core which already embedds

    > B.T.W., I could reproduce the spontaneous reboot with the
    > traps unification with glibc. The change GATE_INTERRUPT ->
    > GATE_TRAP fixed the crash there. Usually I test only with
    > a small klibc-based userspace, and there the reboot does
    > not happen. I guess the int 0x80 interface is less picky.
    > (Just to say that I do test the changes a bit ;) )

    it also passed -tip testing still then so the changes are fine.

    Generally if you see your commits show up and stay in tip/master it
    means they get tested with a newly built random kernel about once every
    two minutes or so.

    regarding klibc, that's interesting: is that the in-kernel klibc from
    hpa? Which tree are you using to pull that into tip/master? (unless i
    misunderstood what you are doing)


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-05 11:37    [W:0.022 / U:11.668 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site