[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:

> Our experience is different. We are also testing with the "protection
> patch" reverted.
> We see that the problem specifically comes and goes when
> removing/adding the use of set_memory_ro/set_memory_rw to the driver.

But if this patch (which is an obvious workaround, compared to the other
patches which fix real bugs, right?) would be catching some malicious
accessess to the mapped EEPROM, there should be stacktraces present in the
kernel log, right?


Jiri Kosina

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-04 12:23    [W:0.091 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site