[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: IRQ balancing on a router
Jason Baron wrote:
>> one of the hard cases for irqbalance is that irqbalance doesn't have a
>> way to find out the actual cpu time spend in the handlers. For
>> networking it makes an estimate just based on the number of packets
>> (which is better than nothing)... but that breaks down if you have an
>> non-symmetry in CPU costs per packet like you have.
>> The good news is that irqthreads at least have the potential to solve
>> this "lack of information"; if not, we could consider doing a form of
>> microaccounting for irq handlers....
> perhaps, this could be addressed using tracepoints. The currently
> proposed ones are at the beginning and end of 'handle_IRQ_event()'. See:
something that you always need should not be a tracepoint.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-03 17:07    [W:0.090 / U:3.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site