[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC v7][PATCH 2/9] General infrastructure for checkpoint restart

Peter Chubb wrote:
>>>>>> "Oren" == Oren Laadan <> writes:
> Oren> Nope, since we will fail to restart in many cases. We will need
> Oren> a way to move from caller's credentials to saved credentials,
> Oren> and even from caller's credentials to privileged credentials
> Oren> (e.g. to reopen a file that was created by a setuid program
> Oren> prior to dropping privileges).
> You can't necessarily tell the difference between this and revocation
> of privilege. For most security models, it must be possible to change
> the permissions on the file, and then the restart should fail.
> In our implementation, we simply refused to checkpoint setid programs.

True. And this works very well for HPC applications.

However, it doesn't work so well for server applications, for instance.

Also, you could use file system snapshotting to ensure that the file
system view does not change, and still face the same issue.

So I'm perfectly ok with deferring this discussion to a later time :)


> --
> Dr Peter Chubb peterc AT
> ERTOS within National ICT Australia

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-27 12:07    [W:0.093 / U:5.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site