Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:53:24 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2) |
| |
Hi David,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:07:53 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > It would be good if you could have a "next" (or "creds-next" or > > something) branch in your tree and I can fetch that (that way I don't > > have to keep updating my configs). It is OK if thet branch rebases and > > may just be an alias for another branch (or a subset if you have > > experimental stuff in there. Remember "posted, reviewed, tested before > > it is in linux-next". > > Those patches aren't likely to change much, and they get hit with LTP > regularly.
They already changed between what I thought was the correct branch and what was the correct branch :-)
> What base for the patches? Linus's head?
Yes. Or whatever it is based on now if that merges OK with Linus' head (try a test merge). Just don't base on linux-next :-)
What I want is exactly what you will ask/have asked Linus to fetch but without the branch name changing .. I care more about the name changing than the contents changing.
So .. what branch do I fetch tomorrow? (Hint: if you have your version for Linus checked out then type "git branch next" and reply to this email saying "next" :-)) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |