[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)
Stephen Rothwell <> wrote:

> Yes. Or whatever it is based on now if that merges OK with Linus' head
> (try a test merge). Just don't base on linux-next :-)

It's based on Linus's head at the moment, give or take the last few bits he
pulled in which I haven't dealt with yet.

> What I want is exactly what you will ask/have asked Linus to fetch but
> without the branch name changing .. I care more about the name changing
> than the contents changing.
> So .. what branch do I fetch tomorrow? (Hint: if you have your version
> for Linus checked out then type "git branch next" and reply to this email
> saying "next" :-))

I asked him to pull creds-v4 last:;a=shortlog;h=creds-v4

I'd quite like to amend the name of the branch to something more sensible,
since the 'v<N>' represented new versions based on fixing up merges with
Linus's tree rather than changing my patches.

However, if you'd rather I just threw new merges on top of that, then I can do
that - it's just got a silly branch name.

Alternatively, if you'd rather James pulled it into his 'next' branch, he
might be amenable to that.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-26 17:09    [W:0.044 / U:1.344 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site