Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:19:49 +0200 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: wierd new config options |
| |
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:59:42PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >Why is UNEVICTABLE_LRU and option? Is there any rason to turn it off or > >is this just to confuse users? > > Since the swapout code itself is already configurable with > CONFIG_SWAP, I do believe we want to be able to config out > the unevictable LRU code. > > I guess it could be argued that maybe CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU > should just be folded into CONFIG_SWAP...
Sounds like a good plan.
| |