lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask

* Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
> >>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
> >> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various
> >> arch changes for this reason.
> >>
> >>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
> >>>
> >>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
> >> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is
> >> just porting the changes across to your tree now.
> >
> > guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today
> > and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and
> > pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for
> > the rest of the changes.
> >
> > Ingo
>
> Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so
> they would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of
> "replacement" patches if you prefer.

how big are the deltas? You might send a single interdiff - it's
supposed to be all small, right?

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-23 18:37    [W:0.117 / U:0.496 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site