lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask

    * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:

    > Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
    > >
    > >> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > >>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
    > >>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
    > >> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various
    > >> arch changes for this reason.
    > >>
    > >>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
    > >>>
    > >>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
    > >> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is
    > >> just porting the changes across to your tree now.
    > >
    > > guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today
    > > and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and
    > > pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for
    > > the rest of the changes.
    > >
    > > Ingo
    >
    > Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so
    > they would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of
    > "replacement" patches if you prefer.

    how big are the deltas? You might send a single interdiff - it's
    supposed to be all small, right?

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-23 18:37    [W:3.168 / U:0.388 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site