Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:35:08 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask |
| |
* Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > > >> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote: > >>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive > >>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes: > >> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various > >> arch changes for this reason. > >> > >>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked: > >>> > >>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid > >> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is > >> just porting the changes across to your tree now. > > > > guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today > > and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and > > pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for > > the rest of the changes. > > > > Ingo > > Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so > they would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of > "replacement" patches if you prefer.
how big are the deltas? You might send a single interdiff - it's supposed to be all small, right?
Ingo
| |