lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
>>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
>> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various
>> arch changes for this reason.
>>
>>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
>>>
>>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
>> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is
>> just porting the changes across to your tree now.
>
> guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today
> and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and
> pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for
> the rest of the changes.
>
> Ingo

Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so they
would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of "replacement"
patches if you prefer.

Thanks,
Mike


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-23 18:19    [W:0.138 / U:13.180 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site