[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rusty Russell <> wrote:
>> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
>>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
>> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various
>> arch changes for this reason.
>>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
>>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
>> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is
>> just porting the changes across to your tree now.
> guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today
> and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and
> pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for
> the rest of the changes.
> Ingo

Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so they
would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of "replacement"
patches if you prefer.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-23 18:19    [W:0.086 / U:8.288 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site