Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:09:59 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask |
| |
* Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive > >> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes: > > > > Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various arch > > changes for this reason. > > > >> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked: > >> > >> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid > > > > Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is just > > porting the changes across to your tree now. > > > > Cheers, > > Rusty. > > Hi Ingo, > > It would seem easier to back out previous patches and apply the > replacements. Does this work for you?
no, it does not work fine. As i said, i reworked various small bits along the way of reviewing and integrating them, under the obvious assumption that you submitted the latest and greatest. I spent hours testing every single step as well. If you cannot get your workflow right then we cannot have this stuff in v2.6.28.
So ... please send append-only changes against tip/cpus4096-v2. We can squash/backmerge any bits to keep it all clean, but all changes have to be fully visible and fully reviewed from now on, because time is running short.
Ingo
| |