[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask

Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:

Run 140: 11 of 19 OK

8 architecture configs out of 19 fail to build, 7 of which failures is
this patchset's fault:

powerpc, ps3_defconfig:

error: implicit declaration of function '__cpus_setall'

m32r defconfig:

from /home/tglx/work/kernel/autoqa/linux-2.6-tip/arch/m32r/kernel/smp.c:18:
include2/asm/smp.h:66: error: expected ')' before '*' token
include2/asm/smp.h:66: error: expected ')' before 'cpu_possible_mask'
include2/asm/smp.h:67: error: expected ')' before '*' token
include2/asm/smp.h:67: error: expected ')' before 'cpu_present_mask'

xtensa defconfig:

from /home/tglx/work/kernel/autoqa/linux-2.6-tip/arch/xtensa/k
'CONFIG_NR_CPUS' undeclared here (not in a function)

powerpc mpc5200_defconfig:

warning: "CONFIG_NR_CPUS" is not defined
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2

sparc32 defconfig:

error: 'CONFIG_NR_CPUS' undeclared here (not in a function)

powerpc ppc64_defconfig:

e.c:117: error: implicit declaration of function '__cpus_setall'
make[3]: *** [arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.o] Error 1

s390 defconfig:

/home/tglx/work/kernel/autoqa/linux-2.6-tip/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c: In
function '__smp_call_function_map':
error: request for member 'bits' in something not a structure or union

it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:

4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid

but some of the others seems to be suspect as well - there's at least 3
different failure patterns.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-23 16:23    [W:0.083 / U:5.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site