[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] enable irqs when waiting for rwlocks
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:31:53AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> Petr Tesarik wrote:
>> Hello,
>> SGI has observed that on large systems, interrupts are not serviced for
>> a long period of time when waiting for a rwlock. The following patch
>> series re-enables irqs while waiting for the lock, resembling the code
>> which is already there for spinlocks.
> Perhaps I'm just out in left field, but that (and the similar behaviour
> for obtaining a spinlock?) feels like treating a symptom rather than a
> root cause where the root cause would appear to be long lock hold
> times/contention?

Sometimes lock contention on large systems will take a few seconds to
pass. This is normal behavior which simply can not be eliminated. For
those cases, we need to rely upon being able to re-enable interrupts and
allowing other operations to continue normally. Simply put, in some
cases, nothing more can be done.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-23 16:15    [W:0.052 / U:3.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site