[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 04/11] ftrace: comment arch ftrace code

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I dunno.
> __copy_to_user_inatomic() is for "copying memory from userspace while
> in an atomic context".
> But what you're doing here is "modifying some kernel text which might
> generate a fault". It seems somewhat interface-abusive to use a
> userspace access function for that just because it happens right now to
> do the right thing.
> I'd suggest that for clarity and for future-safety, you create some new
> interface function which does that thing. Right now it can be a simple
> wrapper around __copy_from_user_inatomic().
> <looks>
> oh, someone added one - probe_kernel_write(). Why not use that?

I didn't know about that code. That is what I want.

-- Steve

> <wonders why he doesn't know what's going on any more>
> Also, I hope that the above code is called from within a
> pagefault_disable()d region? Or are relying upon some magical
> side-effect of something which happens to do the same thing as
> pagefault_disable()? IOW: by what means does the above code ensure
> that do_page_fault() will see in_atomic()==true?

This code is called from kstop_machine, or simply has interrupts disabled.

-- Steve

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-22 21:19    [W:0.135 / U:3.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site