Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:32:30 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: mmotm 2008-10-02-16-17 uploaded |
| |
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2008-10-02-16-17 has been uploaded to > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ > > > > It contains the following patches against 2.6.27-rc8: > > 10 out of 10 build randconfig failures on i386; > 10 out of 10 build randconfig failures on x86_64. > > Summary for i386: > > build-r9491.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c:310: error: too > many arguments to function 'dentry_open' > > ~~~ (with copy-and-paste line breaks) > > build-r9502.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c:1539: warn > ing: format '%08x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'u64' > build-r9502.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c:1540: warn > ing: format '%08x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'u64'
Weren't these already fixed once? Could they be in one of the 180-or-so -tip branches but you don't have it?
> > Summary for x86_64: > > (lots of these) > build-r9493.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:1284: warn > ing: format '%08x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' > build-r9493.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:1285: warn > ing: format '%08x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int'
Same question for these...
> build-r9493.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c:310: error: too > many arguments to function 'dentry_open'
You (akpm) made a patch (autofs4-add-miscellaneous-device-for-ioctls-fix-fix-3.patch) which adds arg4 to this call to dentry_open() but I can't find why/where a 4th arg was added and the patch doesn't seem to be needed here/now. what gives?
--- ~Randy
| |