lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: mmotm 2008-10-02-16-17 uploaded
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
>
> > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2008-10-02-16-17 has been uploaded to
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> >
> > It contains the following patches against 2.6.27-rc8:
>
> 10 out of 10 build randconfig failures on i386;
> 10 out of 10 build randconfig failures on x86_64.
>
> Summary for i386:
>
> build-r9491.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c:310: error: too
> many arguments to function 'dentry_open'
>
> ~~~ (with copy-and-paste line breaks)
>
> build-r9502.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c:1539: warn
> ing: format '%08x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'u64'
> build-r9502.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c:1540: warn
> ing: format '%08x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'u64'

Weren't these already fixed once? Could they be in one of the 180-or-so
-tip branches but you don't have it?

>
> Summary for x86_64:
>
> (lots of these)
> build-r9493.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:1284: warn
> ing: format '%08x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int'
> build-r9493.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:1285: warn
> ing: format '%08x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int'

Same question for these...

> build-r9493.out:/home/rdunlap/linsrc/mmotm-2008-1002-1617/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c:310: error: too
> many arguments to function 'dentry_open'

You (akpm) made a patch (autofs4-add-miscellaneous-device-for-ioctls-fix-fix-3.patch)
which adds arg4 to this call to dentry_open() but I can't find why/where a 4th arg
was added and the patch doesn't seem to be needed here/now. what gives?


---
~Randy


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-03 05:35    [W:0.605 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site