lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers
From
Date
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 21:28 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Clearly threading irq handlers does have something to do with real
> > > > time, unless this patch isn't actually threading anything ..
>
> Well, that's clearly wrong: threaded IRQ handlers are not tied to
> real-time in any way. Yes, they can be used for RT too but as far as the
> upstream kernel is involved that's at most an afterthought.

You contradict yourself .. I said "Clearly threading irq handlers does
have something to do with real time" then you say "they can be used for
RT too" .. So my comments are clearly correct , they have "something" to
do with real time. There exists a relationship of some kind or type.

You should go back and read my initial questions, they are reasonable ..

> > > Clearly you have neither clue about real time nor about operating
> > > systems in general.
> >
> > Here we go again Thomas.. You think you can have a conversation
> > without the insults for once?
>
> what Thomas said was a strong but fair reaction to your obviously
> incorrect statement. What reaction did you expect?

We need less insults on this list not more.. Maybe I could understand
his reaction had I insulted him, but I didn't.. "Fair reaction" doesn't
fit in this case ..

Daniel



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-02 22:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans