[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Block integrity patches for 2.6.28
>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <> writes:

Jens> As far as I can tell, most of that commit is still fine. You
Jens> want bdev_get_integrity() in blkdev.h, the 3 other moves and the
Jens> unused bdev_get_tag_size() do not look like they are being used
Jens> by this patch set.

bdev_get_integrity() and bdev_get_tag_size() are being used by
stacking drivers and filesystems to prepare I/O. It's correct that
none of the in-tree stuff currently uses bdev_get_tag_size(). That's
coming with the btrfs support. If you want to pull that out for now
and have me put that back later in that's ok. Just adds another
two-stage merge dependency for a later cycle.

bdev_integrity_enabled() and blk_integrity_tuple_size() are only being
used from within bio-integrity.c and can move there. I originally put
them in blkdev.h because they are block device functions and not bio

Want me to submit a new patch shuffling bdev_get_integrity() back
where it came from?

Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-02 15:59    [W:0.258 / U:30.224 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site