lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [patch] gpiolib: fix oops in gpio_get_value_cansleep()
Date
On Thursday 16 October 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > -     return chip->get(chip, gpio - chip->base);
> > +     return chip->get ? chip->get(chip, gpio - chip->base) : 0;
>
> Why don't we check the .set in the gpio_set_value? Because
> we must always call gpio_direction_output()?

Yes. The output driver needs to be explicitly enabled,
to avoid misbehaving electic circuitry.


> It is not exactly the
> same we work with the input direction.. is this documented anywhere?

In Documentation/gpio.txt since the very first versions.

See the section on "Spinlock-Safe GPIO access", where
special cases for reading the value of output GPIOs are
desribed. Other aspects are mentioned in other spots.

For example, open drain signals -- as used with I2C and
other protocols -- only drive the "low" signal level,
and if code wants a "high" level it's got to verify that
nobody else is driving that shared line to low. By
reading it back, even though it's configured as output.

- Dave


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-16 19:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans