[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change
* Greg KH <> wrote:

> So, as someone who constantly is dealing with kernel version
> numbers all the time with the -stable trees, our current numbering
> scheme is a pain a times. How about this proposal instead?

Why not just keep it? It has worked so far, and from a strictly
end-user point of view I cannot see any advantages at all with a new
scheme. The ideas mentioned so far don't cut it either.

Just my heretic 2 cents,

PS: Nice timing, thunderstorm approaching.

In Russia, President kills Financial Crisis
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-16 16:59    [W:0.166 / U:2.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site