[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: trivial patches: Should we care about control reaches end of non-void function
    >   I see some functions in the kernel have added "return 0" after the
    > BUG, presumably to silence these warnings. Would a patch to do this
    > consistently, or is that too trivial even for trivial patches?

    Probably better to mark BUG() properly for the compiler.

    If you can get __attribute((__noreturn__)) on the end of the BUG function
    somehow say

    static inline void bug_off(void) __attribute((__noreturn__)) {};

    and expanded that onto the end of the macro maybe it would shut up


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-16 00:29    [W:0.019 / U:32.372 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site