Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:11:48 -0700 | From | Yinghai Lu <> | Subject | Re: [git pull, take 2] x86 updates for v2.6.28, phase #9, sparse IRQ support |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: >>> >>>> Linus, >>>> >>>> Please pull the latest x86-v28-for-linus-phase9 git tree from: >>>> >>>> Sparse IRQ support - make NR_IRQS dynamic by turning it into nr_irqs, >>>> an by creating irq descriptors in a sparse way. >>>> >>>> Includes a number of dependent x86 topics: timers/hpet-percpu, IO-APIC >>>> and local APIC code unification, UV support updates. >>>> >>>> Has been cross-built on all architectures we could get crosscompilers >>>> for: >>>> >>>> http://www.tglx.de/autoqa/index >>>> >>>> It should be largely uneventful for sparse-irq unaware, non-x86 >>>> architectures. >>> please find updated pull request below. Relative to phase-N-1. Updates >>> from today in this class of topics: >>> >>> b570868: x86: apic - unify APIC_DIVISOR >>> >>> And i removed: >>> >>> eada62c: acpi/x86: introduce __apci_map_table, v4 >>> >>> [ Cc:-ed Yinghai for that - we can live without that patch (i.e. we at >>> most get a leak warning) and can have that via acpi.git, correct? ] >> yes. we have several patches that even didn't pick up for a while. >> >> also please ask Linus to pull pci tree from Jesse before sparseirq. >> >> because we need >> PCI: change MSI-x vector to 32bit >> >> in pci tree. > > is it absolutely needed? >
qla2xxx with MSI-X will crash. only happend with the new card that support msi-x.
so it is not absolutely needed.
YH
| |