[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Makes sense. My only concern is that we make sure this is behavior we
> can count on in the future and not just an artifact of the current
> kthread implementation. If that's the case, then I'll plan to remove it
> on the next respin.

It's absolutely intentional and one of the reasons why the kthread
infrastructure is so much nicer than plain kthread_create :)

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-09 19:17    [W:0.120 / U:11.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site