Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:44:12 -0500 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck |
| |
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:52:14 +0300 Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:
> Ok, but let's look at this a bit more opportunistic / optimistic.
You can't play fast and loose with data integrity.
Besides, if we looked at things optimistically, we would conclude that no fsck will be needed, ever :)
> > http://infohost.nmt.edu/~val/review/chunkfs.pdf
You will really want to read this paper, if you haven't already.
-- All Rights Reversed
| |