[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I imagined it would check for
> +struct file_operations ... = {
> +      ...
> +       .ioctl = ...
> That wouldn't catch the case of someone adding only .ioctl to an
> already existing file_operations which is not visible in the patch context,
> but that should be hopefully rare. The more common case is adding
> completely new operations

Right, this would work fine. We can probably even have a list of
data structures that work like file_operations in this regard.

Arnd <><
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-09 02:23    [W:0.058 / U:38.536 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site