[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] procfs: provide slub's /proc/slabinfo

    On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 18:21 +0200, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
    > Hi Matt,
    > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Matt Mackall wrote:
    > > > SLUB can align these without a 2 byte
    > > > overhead. In some configurations this results in SLUB using even less
    > > > memory than SLOB. See f.e. Pekka's test at
    > > >
    > >
    > > Available memory after boot is not a particularly stable measurement and
    > > not valid if there's memory pressure. At any rate, I wasn't able to
    > > reproduce this.
    > So, I have this silly memory profiler derived from the kleak patches by
    > the relayfs people and would love to try it out on an embedded workload
    > where SLUB memory footprint is terrible. Any suggestions?

    Or you could use this (which is a bit broken on modern kernels, but
    provides lots of interesting detail):

    I don't have any particular "terrible" workloads for SLUB. But my
    attempts to simply boot with all three allocators to init=/bin/bash in,
    say, lguest show a fair margin for SLOB.

    Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-06 18:55    [W:0.021 / U:18.968 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site