Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:06:42 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch?] s2ram + P4 + tsc = annoyance |
| |
* Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> On Sun 2007-12-30 15:08:15, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > ok, i prefer this fix a bit more. (we dont want to set last_tsc > > > outside of the sync_lock - which your initial patch does) > > > > i've added your patch to x86.git - thanks Mike! (patch below) I > > think this would be too dangerous for v2.6.24 though - we can put it > > back into -stable for 2.6.24.1, once it had more testing? > > If it is too dangerous for -final, I guess it is bad idea to push it > into -stable.
we regularly delay bugs to the .1 release, if a fix is a bit complex and just needs a bit of time to be fully trusted for a stable release.
> Plus it does not fix really bad bug.
yeah, granted.
Ingo
| |