lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch?] s2ram + P4 + tsc = annoyance

* Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

> On Sun 2007-12-30 15:08:15, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > ok, i prefer this fix a bit more. (we dont want to set last_tsc
> > > outside of the sync_lock - which your initial patch does)
> >
> > i've added your patch to x86.git - thanks Mike! (patch below) I
> > think this would be too dangerous for v2.6.24 though - we can put it
> > back into -stable for 2.6.24.1, once it had more testing?
>
> If it is too dangerous for -final, I guess it is bad idea to push it
> into -stable.

we regularly delay bugs to the .1 release, if a fix is a bit complex and
just needs a bit of time to be fully trusted for a stable release.

> Plus it does not fix really bad bug.

yeah, granted.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-05 10:09    [W:0.052 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site