Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:23:34 +0100 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm] compat_binfmt_elf Kconfig |
| |
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:12:28PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > I have no opinions about the config symbol names. Among the existing > precedents for internal/descriptionless symbols I find more not using the > HAVE_ prefix than those using it. The convention is newly established - so no suprise.
> The patch versions I've sent now work > fine, fix the parallel build problem people were seeing, and AFAICT follow > the style of what's already in common use. At this point, I think it would > be easiest just to keep them and have you send symbol-renaming patches > for any and all symbols of this sort that concern you as separate cleanups. Would love to - but the pile of other kbuild stuff only gets bigger..
Sam
| |